Our pick : Hargreaves Lansdown (74/100) · Cheapest : Trading 212 · Best value : Interactive Investor
This comparison evaluates nine investment platforms based on twelve criteria, including trading fees, platform fees, minimum investment, regulation, range of investments, and fund selection. Hargreaves Lansdown ranks highest with a score of 74 out of 100, largely due to its perfect scores in customer support and fund selection. Trading 212 is the next best at 68 out of 100, excelling in trading fees and offering the cheapest overall option. It's important to note that data for only four out of the nine options was sourced, with the remaining values being estimates. The facts in this summary are computed from the table below; only the wording is generated.
| Criterion | Hargreaves Lansdown | Trading 212 | Interactive Investor | eToro | Fidelity Personal Investing | AJ Bell |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trading Fees (GBP) | 5.95 | 0 | 3.99 | 0.0 | 7.5 | 9.95 |
| Platform Fees (GBP) | 0.45 | 0 | 4.99 | 0.0 | 0.35 | 0.25 |
| Minimum Investment (GBP) | 25 | 1 | 1 | 50 | 0 | 25 |
| Regulation | FCA Regulated | FCA Regulated | FCA Regulated | FCA Regulated | FCA Regulated | FCA |
| Range of Investments (types) | 3500 | 10000 | 15000 | 5000 | 2500 | 2000 |
| Fund Selection (funds) | 2000 | 0 | 1000 | 0 | 1200 | 1500 |
| Share Dealing Options | Full range including UK, US, and European shares | Commission-free stock and ETF trading, fractional shares | UK, US, and international shares | Stocks, ETFs, Crypto, CFDs | UK, US, and European shares | UK, US, and European shares |
| Account Types | ISA, JISA, SIPP, General Investment Account | ISA, SIPP, General Investment Account | ISA, SIPP, General Investment Account | General Investment Account | ISA, SIPP, General Investment Account | ISA, JISA, SIPP, General Investment Account |
| Ease of Use | Standard | Advanced | Standard | Advanced | Standard | Standard |
| Research Tools | Comprehensive | Limited | Comprehensive | Limited | Comprehensive | Standard |
| Customer Support | Excellent | Basic | Standard | Standard | Standard | Standard |
| Mobile App Availability | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Based on our comprehensive comparison of trading fees, platform fees, minimum investment, regulation, range of investments, and fund selection, Hargreaves Lansdown ranks highest with a score of 74/100, followed closely by Trading 212.
Our comparison evaluates trading fees across various platforms, considering factors like commission per trade and spread costs to help you find the most cost-effective option for your investment strategy.
We assess the breadth of investment options available, including stocks, bonds, ETFs, and funds, to identify platforms that cater to diverse investment needs and preferences.
Hargreaves Lansdown currently leads our ranking with a score of 74/100, reflecting its strong performance across key criteria. Our rankings are based on objective data and are not influenced by commercial partnerships, ensuring a neutral assessment.
Ranking: options are sorted on measured, sourced criteria. No position is ever sold, and no advertiser pays to appear here.
Scope: this comparison is not exhaustive. It presents the options our sources document, not every offer on the market.
Earnings: some outbound links may be affiliate links that earn us a commission. This never affects the ranking, the scores or the data.
Data: every value is linked to its source and refreshed automatically; the collection date is shown.