Our pick : LG CineBeam HU810PW (77/100) · Cheapest : XGIMI Horizon Pro · Best value : XGIMI Horizon Pro
This comparison covers 10 projecteurs across 12 criteria: Resolution, Brightness (Lumens), Contrast Ratio, Lamp Life (hours), Price / month, Connectivity. LG CineBeam HU810PW comes first with 77/100, driven by Contrast Ratio (100/100) and Keystone Correction (100/100). XGIMI Horizon Pro follows at 76/100 and beats it on Portability. The cheapest option is XGIMI Horizon Pro. Sourced data: 1/10 options; the remaining values are estimates, flagged as such.
| Criterion | LG CineBeam HU810PW | XGIMI Horizon Pro | Optoma UHD55 | ViewSonic PX748-4K | Epson EH-TW7100 | BenQ W2700 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 4K UHD | 4K UHD | 4K UHD | 4K UHD | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Brightness (Lumens) (lumens) | 2700 | 2200 | 3600 | 4000 | 2700 | 2000 |
| Contrast Ratio | 2000000 | 100000 | 1200000 | 12000 | 100000 | 30000 |
| Lamp Life (hours) (hours) | 20000 | 25000 | 15000 | 6000 | 5000 | 4000 |
| Price / month (GBP) | 60 | 40 | 55 | 48 | 50 | 45 |
| Connectivity | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Portability | Medium | High | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| Noise Level (dB) (dB) | 29 | 30 | 26 | 31 | 24 | 29 |
| Keystone Correction | Auto | Auto | Auto | Manual | Manual | Manual |
| Built-in Speakers | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Display Technology | Laser | LED | DLP | DLP | LCD | DLP |
| Throw Ratio | 1.19 - 1.61:1 | 1.2:1 | 1.21 - 1.51:1 | 1.14 - 1.43:1 | 1.35 - 2.84:1 | 1.15 - 1.50:1 |
LG CineBeam HU810PW ranks first in our comparison (77/100), ahead of XGIMI Horizon Pro. The ranking is based on Resolution, Brightness (Lumens), Contrast Ratio, Lamp Life (hours) - every value is sourced and no placement is paid for.
The most affordable option is XGIMI Horizon Pro.
The comparison is based on: Resolution, Brightness (Lumens), Contrast Ratio, Lamp Life (hours), Price / month, Connectivity.
Yes: data collected {age}, with every value sourced and refreshed automatically.
No. No position is sold: the order depends only on objective criteria. Some links may be affiliated, with no effect on the ranking or the data.
Ranking: options are sorted on measured, sourced criteria. No position is ever sold, and no advertiser pays to appear here.
Scope: this comparison is not exhaustive. It presents the options our sources document, not every offer on the market.
Earnings: some outbound links may be affiliate links that earn us a commission. This never affects the ranking, the scores or the data.
Data: every value is linked to its source and refreshed automatically; the collection date is shown.