Our pick : Fidelity (99/100) · Cheapest : Fidelity
This comparison evaluates 13 stock trading apps based on 12 criteria, including commission per trade, account minimum, margin rates, platform ease of use, research tools, and mobile app features, with Fidelity ranking first overall with a score of 99/100, largely due to its perfect scores in account minimum and customer support, and it is also identified as the cheapest option; the data used for this comparison includes sourced information for 6 out of the 13 options, with the remaining values being estimates that are clearly indicated as such. The facts in this summary are computed from the table below; only the wording is generated.
| Criterion | Fidelity | Charles Schwab | Merrill Edge | TD Ameritrade | Robinhood | E*TRADE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commission per Trade (USD) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Account Minimum (USD) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Margin Rates (%) | 4.75 | 7.75 | 7.75 | 7.75 | — | 7.75 |
| Platform Ease of Use | High | High | High | Medium | High | High |
| Research Tools | Advanced | Advanced | Advanced | Advanced | Advanced | Standard |
| Mobile App Features | Advanced | Advanced | Advanced | Advanced | Advanced | Standard |
| Account Types | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ETF Selection | Extensive | Extensive | Extensive | Good | Good | Good |
| Educational Resources | Extensive | Extensive | Extensive | Good | Good | Good |
| Customer Support | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Basic | Excellent |
| Fractional Shares | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Options Trading Support | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
In 2026, Fidelity stands out as a top stock trading app with a score of 99/100, closely followed by Charles Schwab, based on our comprehensive comparison.
Fidelity and Charles Schwab are leading platforms, evaluated on criteria like commission per trade, account minimum, margin rates, platform ease of use, research tools, and mobile app features.
Yes, Fidelity's platform ease of use is a key factor in its high ranking, alongside its robust research tools and mobile app features.
Our rankings are based on objective data and analysis of key features; we do not accept payment for placement, ensuring a neutral and reliable comparison for users.
Ranking: options are sorted on measured, sourced criteria. No position is ever sold, and no advertiser pays to appear here.
Scope: this comparison is not exhaustive. It presents the options our sources document, not every offer on the market.
Earnings: some outbound links may be affiliate links that earn us a commission. This never affects the ranking, the scores or the data.
Data: every value is linked to its source and refreshed automatically; the collection date is shown.