Unranked list: no comparable, sourced data is publicly available for these items. We list them without ranking, rather than inventing figures.
| Criterion | Epson EcoTank ET-2850 | HP Smart Tank 7305 | Brother DCP-L267DWE | Canon Pixma G3270 Wireless MegaTank All-In-One Printer | Canon Selphy CP1500 Wireless Compact Photo Printer | HP LaserJet M209dw |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost per page (ink/toner) (GBP) | — | — | — | 0.003 | — | — |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Print speed (black) (ppm) | — | — | — | 11 | — | — |
| Print speed (colour) (ppm) | — | — | — | 6 | — | — |
| Paper tray capacity (sheets) | — | — | — | 100 | — | — |
| Fonctionnalites copie | Basic copy | Basic copy | Basic copy | Basic copy | — | — |
| Fonctionnalites scan | Basic scan | Basic scan | Basic scan | Basic scan | — | — |
This comparison evaluates seven all-in-one printers based on eleven criteria, including cost per page for ink or toner, monthly running costs, print resolution, connectivity, and print speeds for both black and color documents, with the Canon Pixma G3270 Wireless MegaTank All-In-One Printer identified as the most affordable option, although data for four of the seven options is sourced while the remaining values are estimates. The facts in this summary are computed from the table below; only the wording is generated.
Based on our analysis of cost per page, running costs, resolution, connectivity, and speed, the Epson EcoTank ET-2850 is currently the top-rated all-in-one printer.
Our rankings are based on objective data for key criteria like ink costs, print resolution, and speed. We do not accept payment for placement, ensuring our comparisons are neutral and data-driven.
Key factors include the cost per page for ink or toner, monthly running costs, print resolution for quality, available connectivity options, and print speeds for both black and color documents.
The HP Smart Tank 7305 is a strong contender, ranking just behind the Epson EcoTank ET-2850, and offers a good balance of features and performance.
Ranking: options are sorted on measured, sourced criteria. No position is ever sold, and no advertiser pays to appear here.
Scope: this comparison is not exhaustive. It presents the options our sources document, not every offer on the market.
Earnings: some outbound links may be affiliate links that earn us a commission. This never affects the ranking, the scores or the data.
Data: every value is linked to its source and refreshed automatically; the collection date is shown.