Our pick : J.P. Morgan Personal Investing (100/100)
| Criterion | J.P. Morgan Personal Investing | Chase | Raisin | Lloyds Banking Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shares Trading (available) | ✓ | — | ✓ | — |
| Account Management App (available) | ✓ | ✓ | — | — |
This comparison covers 4 stocks and shares ISAs across 12 criteria, including annual management fee, platform fee, dealing charges, fund range, shares trading, and ETF offering, with J.P. Morgan Personal Investing ranking first with a perfect score of 100/100, largely due to its Account Management App which also scored 100/100. The facts in this summary are computed from the table below; only the wording is generated.
In 2026, J.P. Morgan Personal Investing leads our comparison with a perfect score, followed closely by Chase. Our rankings are based on objective data across annual management fees, platform fees, dealing charges, fund range, shares trading, and ETF offerings.
Providers are evaluated on their Annual Management Fee, Platform Fee, and Dealing Charges. Lower fees generally mean more of your investment returns stay with you.
We assess the Fund Range, Shares Trading capabilities, and ETF Offering to determine which providers give you the most investment options.
No, our comparison is completely neutral. Our ranking methodology is transparent, and each data point is sourced independently, not influenced by any payments or commercial agreements with the providers.
Ranking: options are sorted on measured, sourced criteria. No position is ever sold, and no advertiser pays to appear here.
Scope: this comparison is not exhaustive. It presents the options our sources document, not every offer on the market.
Earnings: some outbound links may be affiliate links that earn us a commission. This never affects the ranking, the scores or the data.
Data: every value is linked to its source and refreshed automatically; the collection date is shown.