Our pick : Figo Pet Insurance (71/100)
| Criterion | Figo Pet Insurance | MetLife Pet Insurance | Healthy Paws Pet Insurance | Spot | Embrace Pet Insurance | ASPCA Pet Health Insurance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-existing Conditions | Not Covered | Not Covered | Not Covered | Covered after waiting period | Not Covered | Not Covered |
| Waiting Period (Accidents) (jours) | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 2 |
| Waiting Period (Illnesses) (jours) | 14 | 14 | 15 | 14 | 14 | 14 |
| Wellness Coverage | — | — | — | — | ✓ | — |
| Reimbursement Percentage (%) | 90% | 80% | 80% | 90% | 90% | 90% |
| Accident coverage | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Illness coverage | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vet choice | Any Licensed Vet | Any Licensed Vet | Any Licensed Vet | Any Licensed Vet | Any Licensed Vet | Any Licensed Vet |
This comparison evaluates 13 pet insurance policies based on 10 criteria, including pre-existing conditions, waiting periods for accidents and illnesses, wellness coverage, monthly premiums, and annual deductibles. Figo Pet Insurance ranks highest with a score of 71 out of 100, largely due to its perfect scores in reimbursement percentage and waiting period for accidents. The data for 5 of the 13 options was sourced directly, while the remaining values are estimates and have been flagged accordingly. The facts in this summary are computed from the table below; only the wording is generated.
Based on our comprehensive comparison, Figo Pet Insurance ranks highest with a score of 71/100, followed closely by MetLife Pet Insurance.
Generally, most pet insurance plans, including those we reviewed, do not cover pre-existing conditions. It's crucial to check the specific policy details.
Waiting periods for accidents vary by provider. For example, some plans may have a waiting period of just a few days for accident coverage.
Our rankings are based on objective data across key criteria like pre-existing conditions, waiting periods, wellness coverage, monthly premiums, and annual deductibles. Our comparisons are neutral and not influenced by paid placements.
Ranking: options are sorted on measured, sourced criteria. No position is ever sold, and no advertiser pays to appear here.
Scope: this comparison is not exhaustive. It presents the options our sources document, not every offer on the market.
Earnings: some outbound links may be affiliate links that earn us a commission. This never affects the ranking, the scores or the data.
Data: every value is linked to its source and refreshed automatically; the collection date is shown.