Our pick : Schwab Intelligent Portfolios (89/100) · Cheapest : Betterment · Best value : SoFi Automated Investing
This comparison of 10 robo-advisors across 9 criteria, including management fee, account minimum, ETF expense ratios, tax-loss harvesting, IRA availability, and human advisor access, places Schwab Intelligent Portfolios first with a score of 89/100, largely due to its perfect scores in human advisor access and investment options. Vanguard Digital Advisor ranks second with 79/100, excelling in ETF expense ratios, while Betterment is identified as the most affordable option. It's important to note that data for 6 out of the 10 options is sourced, with the remaining values being estimates and flagged accordingly. The facts in this summary are computed from the table below; only the wording is generated.
| Criterion | Schwab Intelligent Portfolios | Vanguard Digital Advisor | Betterment | SoFi Automated Investing | Fidelity Go | Wealthfront |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Management Fee (%) | 0 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0 | 0.35 | 0.25 |
| Account Minimum (USD) | 5000 | 100 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 500 |
| ETF Expense Ratios (%) | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0 | 0.12 |
| Tax-Loss Harvesting (boolean) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | ✓ |
| Human Advisor Access (boolean) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Investment Options (count) | 50 | 15 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 10 |
In 2026, Schwab Intelligent Portfolios leads our ranking with a score of 89/100, followed closely by Vanguard Digital Advisor, based on key criteria like management fees and account minimums.
Robo-advisor fees vary, with management fees, ETF expense ratios, and other costs being crucial factors. Our comparison details these for each service.
Account minimums differ significantly between robo-advisors. We've compiled this information to help you find a service that fits your investment needs.
Yes, our rankings are completely unbiased. We do not accept payment for placement, and all data used for our comparisons is sourced and verifiable.
Ranking: options are sorted on measured, sourced criteria. No position is ever sold, and no advertiser pays to appear here.
Scope: this comparison is not exhaustive. It presents the options our sources document, not every offer on the market.
Earnings: some outbound links may be affiliate links that earn us a commission. This never affects the ranking, the scores or the data.
Data: every value is linked to its source and refreshed automatically; the collection date is shown.